When a relational theory is structurally designed with "chemisty" that makes sense, electrical stability is created and shared. Livin4d is not only biologically 'based,' it is chemically and mathematically stable as well.
This blog post will add to the previous blog post mathematically substantiating the foundational structure of livin4d. The blog post to follow will apply this Mathematical concept of angles, direction and momentum to chemical ionic and covalent shares and bonds. Livin4d doesn't "reinvent any wheels" to use the regurgitated expression so to speak. Livin4d utilizes the hard sciences to create a viable milieu for living and connecting.
As mentioned in a previous blog post, bisecting angle views at 50 degrees is not sufficient in terms of building relational connectivity. As individuals we each have unique views in any given situation. These are parameters that will not change as we are contained in our soma (bodies).
Imagine any given difference in view. Visualize yourself standing due North looking due South (the direction you as an individual want to head). Visualize your "other," standing due East looking due West (the direction your "other" wants to head). The 50/50 juncture would be at the 45 degree angle heading South West. This will not work as Livin4d will explain in a moment. If the direction is switched, the same conceptual flaw exists: If you are standing due South looking at your "other" who is standing due west, meeting 50/50, you would head North East. This concept is flawed in a couple of ways.
Any momentum moving toward each other from 2 points (the people) at a 90 degree angle will culminate in one of the two following results:
1. As you both stand or walk moving in the shared direction of South West or North East, you will bump heads at the 45 degree 50/50 supposed meeting place as you will be figuratively walking into a square. Undoubtedly, as one can visualize, hitting an edged corner is not conducive to smooth sailing or curves. Walking at 50/50 or the 45 degree meeting point ends in friction. Friction after friction with any given content disagreement adds up to push individuals further and further away from each other.
2. If you don't bump heads and you move into each other from the East and from the North, or from the West and from the South, you are headed in the shared visional directions but as momentum keeps moving and you follow that same directional plane, you will end up spinning away from each other. "An object in motion remains in motion if not interrupted by an external force."
This momentum concept is supported from a mathematical perspective as can be seen in the attached diagrams. When this momemtum concept is applied to relationships, it can best be imagined through the sense of loss of self.
If you and other give up 1/2 your ideas and keep moving in the direction of NE or SW as a "shared couple," facing the 45 degree angle, you will undoubtedly create distance between each other as the momentum concept creates a sense of "loss of self." It initially moves you toward the shared vision (NE or SW), but as none of likes to feel we are losing ourselves in other, we pull back to our original directional stance or ultimately travel full circle back to ourselves as the momentum continued from a 45 degree angle would bring us full circle as can be seen in the diagram.
Livin4d provides a new angle on shared vision. By adjusting for priorities and determining level of importance with respect to any given scenario and or content, the individuals involved in the decision making process can determine if self or other is on the 60 degree 'side' or the 30 degree 'side' at any given point in time.
As the individual attached to the 60 degree angle has more structural support in both content and love at point 1 and perhaps point 2 and 4; it is important that at other points in time (content/choices) "other" has more structural support in content and love, perhaps at points 3, 5 and 6. These give and takes are not to be divided on a 50/50 basis either.
Livin4d will describe at a further point in time how to adequately assess for self attachment versus relational attachment to determine whether one is in the 60 degree angle or the 30 degree angle at any given point in time.
No comments:
Post a Comment