36. Decreasing Relational Friction with the 60/30 Angle Concept (Part 2)

When a relational theory is structurally designed with "chemisty" that makes sense, electrical stability is created and shared. Livin4d is not only  biologically 'based,' it is chemically and mathematically stable as well.

This blog post will add to the previous blog post mathematically substantiating the foundational  structure of livin4d. The blog post to follow will apply this Mathematical  concept of angles, direction and momentum to chemical ionic and covalent shares and bonds. Livin4d doesn't "reinvent any wheels" to use the regurgitated expression so to speak. Livin4d utilizes the hard sciences to create a viable milieu for living and connecting.

As mentioned in a previous blog post, bisecting angle views at 50 degrees is not sufficient in terms of building relational connectivity. As individuals we each have unique views in any given situation. These are parameters that will not change as we are contained in our soma (bodies).

Imagine any given difference in view. Visualize yourself standing  due North looking due South (the direction you as an individual want  to head). Visualize your "other,"  standing due East looking due West (the direction your "other" wants to head). The 50/50 juncture would be at the 45 degree angle heading South West. This will not work as Livin4d will explain in a moment.  If the direction is switched, the same conceptual flaw exists: If you are standing due South looking at your "other" who is standing due west, meeting 50/50, you would head North East. This concept is flawed in a couple of ways.

Any momentum moving toward each other from 2 points (the people) at a 90 degree angle will culminate in one of the two following results:

1. As you both stand or walk moving in the shared direction of South West or North East, you will  bump heads at the 45 degree 50/50 supposed meeting place as you will be figuratively walking into a square. Undoubtedly, as one can visualize, hitting an edged corner is not conducive to smooth sailing or curves. Walking at 50/50 or the 45 degree meeting point ends in friction. Friction after friction with any given content disagreement adds up to push individuals further and further away from each other.

2. If you don't bump heads and you move into each other from the East and from the North, or from the West and from the South, you are headed in the shared visional  directions but as momentum keeps moving and you follow that same directional plane, you will end up spinning away from each other. "An object in motion remains in motion if not interrupted by an external force."

This momentum concept is supported from a mathematical perspective as can be seen in the attached diagrams. When this momemtum concept is applied to relationships, it can best be imagined through the sense of loss of self.

If you and other give up 1/2 your ideas and keep moving in the direction of NE or SW as a "shared couple," facing the 45 degree angle,  you will undoubtedly create distance between each other as the momentum concept creates a sense of "loss of self." It initially moves you toward the shared vision (NE or SW), but as none of likes to feel we are losing ourselves in other, we pull back to our original directional stance or ultimately travel full circle back to ourselves as the momentum continued from a 45 degree angle would bring us full circle as can be seen in the diagram.

Livin4d provides a new angle on shared vision. By adjusting for priorities and determining level of importance with respect to any given scenario and or content, the individuals involved in the decision making process can determine if self or other is on the 60 degree 'side' or the 30 degree 'side' at any given point in time.

As the individual attached to the 60 degree angle has more structural support in both content and love at point 1 and perhaps point 2 and 4; it is important that at other points in time (content/choices) "other" has more structural support in content and love, perhaps at points 3, 5 and 6. These give and takes are not to be divided on a 50/50 basis either.

Livin4d will describe at a further point in time how to adequately assess for self attachment versus relational attachment to determine whether one is in the 60 degree angle or the 30 degree angle at any given point in time.

32. Decreasing Friction with the 60/30 Angle Concept (Part 1)

This blog will address the importance of relational angles and perspectives in terms of mathematical coneptual angles: 60/30 as seen in nature from both an aerodynamic flight perspective and from an oceanic swimming perspective.

As one can see in the attached diagrams, scientific research substantiates the advantage of 60/30 in terms of relational friction reduction. This angle allows for "hoist" while eliminating "drag."

Currently, people engage in the mirror stare of friction. People often go to individual or couples therapy to complain about problems or attempt to solve relational issues.

One therapist might suggest to "take turns," when making decisions, another therapist might bring you back to childhood crap which doesn't even include the parental crap that the parents unconsciously spill over onto you.

It's basically like blaming the guy who does something stupid for being  retarded. Would we do that? NO . . . because that is overtly "rude." However we covertly do it all the time. We even pay to do it!! For good therapists up to $200/hour.

The generational overlay: G1, G2, G3, G4, G5 (According to the Noah movie . . .5 to be PRecise), is the amount of human sludge we have acquired in the blame game. 

Having a Masters in Marriage Family Therapy and having practiced different forms of it for 10 years, I am qualified to say that the entire PSYCH-illogical system is built on a faulty foundations; as is life for that matter as our lives are "base"d  on interpersonal and self relations. We are not just somabodies but we utilize words. Truth be told, we actually need to break our language down to practically nothing to start the rebuilt of accuracy and truth, but I won't go there now.

To add to my qualifications on making such a bold statement, I have almost completed my PhD in Somatic and Spiritual Psychology which actually means nothing as almost all of what I have been taught my entire LIEf  is a fallacy, but anyway . . . It helped me to go through metamorphosis and sprout wings.

As I was saying, the DSM is entirely flawed. Any and every "mode" of dealing with personal issues and interpersonal relationships "means" no sense.

LIVIN4d provides the "bulbs" of our shoes rather than the roots. I can't speak for you all, but I rather grow toward the something (light or night). I want to be able to exist in a world that is creatively laticed  in logic.

LIVIN4d  is logic as it is based in math. I will give one caveat to this "math thing." If the math system truly reflected balance and sense of equality, there would be a parallel set of numbers reflecting a scale such as: 1+1=1. Conceptually, this is true equality and value that "I" in and of myself am equal to another. Conceptually speaking, the 1+1=1 concept indicates that we do not "need" another to expand. We in and of ourselves are equal to the sum of all our parts. This stated, it is nice to have interpersonal relations.

How would you re-write a math equation to speak for this concept? I might re-write it like 1+1 double infinity 1. Conceptually this would exemplify the mutual exchange of energy. The flows and receptions in both directions.

As for the angles of lIVIN4d's mathematical foundation tennets, applied to relational disagreements, let's examine the 90 degree angle.

Among interpersonal relations on any level of society, if there is a disagreement, it can best be described using the 90 degree angle concept. At first thought, one might imagine a 180 degree angle as two people stand facing each other in arguement. This logically makes no sense however as it symbolocally represents the mirrored stair and is metaphorically flatlined.

We are not mirrors of self, we are 3 different personality types. Let's take the traditional relationship consisting of 2 people. When in argument, imagine a 90 degree angle as one person looks with vantage point or view, straight ahead to the North. Imagine the other person in relation looking due East with his/her unique vantage point. This mathematical concepts starts to eliminate the stair 180 configuration.

The 90 degree angle allows for an actual climb! Other than the climb in a positive direction, let's take the 90 degree angle one step further. Add an extended folcrum to change the view (Folcrum is a separate concept thay will be addressed later).

If you were to negotiate 50/50 or take turns as traditional therapists might suggest, it mathematically bisects the 90 at a 45. This 45 degree angle results in 50/50 which reverts us back to the stare as no leverage is made in any direction. Fast forward to (t2) time 2 and we have the same result: the stare.

LIVIN4d adds the "eye" contributing to the STAIR or climb of connection in a relationship. From an angled perspective, on a shared platform (Tennet 2), if one takes a 60 degree angle and the other takes a 30 degree angle, the rise and run factor is adjusted such that actual movement occurs.

Let's face it, we are not clones of ourselves, nor is it helpful to impose our opinions onto others, nor is it helpful to remain in the 50/50 debate or the 45 degree angle as this concept will continuously keep us facing North and East.

To repeat, the 60/30 interpersonal angle allows for a step in the vertical direction of relational dynamics. This stated, depending on the interaction, at times one person will take the rise and the other the run and vice versa. It is for this reason that upon entering dialogue, Tennet 2 and Tennet 3 should be grounded and x,y determined in order to evaluate personal scale of importance and hence adherence to the the x or the y in any given engagement.

As one can see in the attached diagrams, scientific research substantiates this  relational concept from both an aerodynamic and nautical perspective in that bird flight patterns and fish swim at these angles for advantageous reasons in terms of friction control.